Buying Generic Cialis

4Jun/103

Antibiotics > Ornidazole 500mg Pills (Generic) > 120 Pills > $198.00

Antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 This week I ran into wanting to use C# 4.0 optional parameters, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 but wanted StructureMap (my IoC tool of choice) to respect the default value specified for those optional parameters.

The Problem

Antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 In this example, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 we’ll be pulling a command out of the container.  The important part is the optional constructor parameter (level), antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 and it’s default value (Level.Info).

public class LogCommand

{

    IDestination _destination;

    Level _level;

 

    public LogCommand(

        IDestination destination, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 Level level = Level.Info)

    {

        _destination = destination;

        _level = level;

    }

 

    /* logging code here */

}

 

Antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 Here is your basic usage, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 but doesn’t work since StructureMap doesn’t know how to take advantage of the optional parameters with default values.

var container = new Container(config =>

{

    config.Scan(scanner =>

    {

        scanner.TheCallingAssembly();

        scanner.AddAllTypesOf<IDestination>();

        scanner.WithDefaultConventions();

    });

});

 

var logCommand = container.GetInstance<LogCommand>();

 

Antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 The last line results in an exception because StructureMap doesn’t know how to fill in the level parameter.

The Solution

Antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 We can solve this by adding a new convention.  One that adds information about default constructor arguments.  Here is the implementation of the convention:

public class DefaultCtorParameterConvention : IRegistrationConvention

{

    public void Process(Type type, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 Registry registry)

    {

        if(type.IsAbstract || type.IsEnum)

            return;

 

        var ctor = type.GetGreediestCtor();

 

        if(!ctor.HasOptionalParameters())

            return;

 

        var inst = registry.For(type).Use(type);

 

        foreach(var param in ctor.GetOptionalParameters())

            inst.Child(param.Name).Is(param.DefaultValue);

    }

}

Antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 Note: GetGreediestCtor, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 HasOptionalParameters, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 and GetOptionalParameters are extension methods.  We’ll see their implementation shortly.

Antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 The convention inherits from the IRegistrationConvention, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 which is how you implement new conventions in StructureMap.  It has only one method: Process.  We filter out types that are abstract, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 are enums, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 or have constructors that don’t have optional parameters.  Once we realize we have a constructor we want to deal with, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 we use the Child method, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 that sets either a property or a constructor argument (for our case, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 it’ll always be a constructor argument), antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 and then we set it’s value to the parameter’s default value, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 as provided by the ParameterInfo object, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 for each optional parameter.

Minor Details

Antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 Curious about the implementation of GetGreediestCtor or the *OptionalParameters methods?  If not, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 skip this section.

public static bool HasOptionalParameters(

    this ConstructorInfo ctor)

{

    return ctor.GetOptionalParameters().Any();

}

 

public static IEnumerable<ParameterInfo> GetOptionalParameters(this ConstructorInfo ctor)

{

    return ctor.GetParameters().Where(

        param => param.Attributes

            .HasFlag(ParameterAttributes.Optional));

}

 

public static ConstructorInfo GetGreediestCtor(

    this Type target)

{

    return target.GetConstructors()

        .WithMax(ctor => ctor.GetParameters().Length);

}

 

public static T WithMax<T>(

    this IEnumerable<T> target, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 Func<T, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 int> selector)

{

    int max = -1;

    T currentMax = default(T);

 

    foreach(var item in target)

    {

        var current = selector(item);

        if(current <= max)

            continue;

 

        max = current;

        currentMax = item;

    }

 

    return currentMax;

}

 

Antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00  

The Usage

Antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 Here’s how to use your new convention.

var container = new Container(config =>

{

   config.Scan(scanner =>

   {

       scanner.TheCallingAssembly();

       scanner.AddAllTypesOf<IDestination>();

       scanner.WithDefaultConventions();

       scanner.Convention<DefaultCtorParameterConvention>();

   });

});

 

var logCommand = container.GetInstance<LogCommand>();

 

Antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 Now, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 when we pull the LogCommand out of the container, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 the level parameter gets defaulted to Level.Info, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 just like we specified in the constructor.  Sweet!

Conclusion

Antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 This implementation is somewhat limiting, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 but the version I have in my github repo is a little more open and configurable.  It allows you to customize the instance key/name you use when registering your type, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 and also allows you to do additional, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 non-standard registrations if you need to.

Antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 Also, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 this doesn’t work if you’ve selected a constructor using the SelectConstructor config API from StructureMap, antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 I’m not sure how to tap into that facility to look for that constructor rather than the greediest.

Antibiotics > ornidazole 500mg pills (generic) > 120 pills > $198.00 Am I missing something?  Did something not make sense?  Leave me a note!

Average Rating: 4.4 out of 5 based on 249 user reviews.

11Dec/091

Men's Health > Himplasia 30 Tablet Packet > 3 > $120.00

Men's health > himplasia 30 tablet packet > 3 > $120.00 Man, men's health > himplasia 30 tablet packet > 3 > $120.00 I’d searched for this feature time and time again.  And finally found it here: http://www.kevinwilliampang.com/post/Visual-Studio-Split-Views.aspx

Men's health > himplasia 30 tablet packet > 3 > $120.00 If you don’t want to follow the link…

Men's health > himplasia 30 tablet packet > 3 > $120.00 Just double click that guy, men's health > himplasia 30 tablet packet > 3 > $120.00 or drag it downward, men's health > himplasia 30 tablet packet > 3 > $120.00 and you’ve split your file into two buffers.  Awesomeness.

Men's health > himplasia 30 tablet packet > 3 > $120.00 split

Average Rating: 4.7 out of 5 based on 193 user reviews.

18Nov/090

Women's Health > Dostinex 0.25mg Pills (Generic) > 90 Pills > $266.00

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 In my few days of being a developer, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 I’ve heard and seen lots of talk about Singletons.  Things like

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 Singletons are teh suck.  Don’t use them.  EVAR.

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 to

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 Singleton’s saved my life and marriage!

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 In fact, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 I might’ve been the person that said both of these… gasp!

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 I never like to speak in absolutes, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 so I’ll say it this way (see what I did there?)… if you’re striving to implement a singleton, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 you’re probably wrong.  For all you guys that are right, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 I guess you’re right, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 and you can leave now, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 I guess.  This might help you out.

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 I was reading a blog from Mr. Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 Dependency where he was talking about statics and basically what amounts to global state, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 and how thatultimate-geeks-multi-tool-hammer binds you into globally available, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 global data, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 which usually (always?) turns into anarchy.

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 How do we always get ourselves into this mess if we know it’s bad in the first place?  Well, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 some of us (those who are now zombocomming, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 from above) don’t know it’s bad in the first place, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 and the rest of us probably do it because it’s easy to implement, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 and we understand it.  Long story short, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 we can do the singleton implementation in our sleep, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 so we pull out the singleton hammer, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 and smack the nail.  It always goes in a little sideways, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 but at least it goes in.

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 Maybe we should be using a different hammer?

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 What I’d like to do now, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 is propose to split singleton in two.  I think there are two distinct responsibilities that the current thought of ‘singleton’ introduces. Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 It:

  • Manages Session Scoping/Lifecycle/Lifestyle (albeit, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 poorly, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 only one strategy is available)
  • Disables the ability to create more

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 When I talk about this out loud, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 I call the two approaches the singleton implementation pattern, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 and singleton lifecycle.

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 What I am a fan of, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 is the singleton lifecycle.  You create one of those objects, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 and use it throughout the application.  You don’t get messy and allow global access to it all over the place (which necessarily happens when you have global state).  You intentionally inject it to collaborators, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 and  intentionally don’t inject it to non-collaborators (don’t just hand this guy out willy-nilly, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 he’s important).

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 So naturally, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 the naysayers ask/demand:

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 How do you manage that there is a public constructor on this class!?  Dev’s are going to be new’ing this thing up all over the place!

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 I say:

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 False.  Use a DI tool and let it manage it for you.  Or establish a convention with your team, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 and enforce it through social contracts. Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 Both of these approaches allow your scope lifecycle turn into whatever you want at any time, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 in case you decide global isn’t what you really want.  It can be application session scoped, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 or some other scope, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 test scoped, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 or whatever you want… incredibly flexible.

Women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 If you go with the DI tool approach, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 instead of tying yourself to a particular scope, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 you can now have any scope you want, women's health > dostinex 0.25mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $266.00 by changing a configuration parameter.  Delaying decisions until the latest responsible moment… seems like I’ve heard that one before.

Average Rating: 5 out of 5 based on 287 user reviews.

23Sep/091

Diabetes Treatment > Lantus (Generic) > 60 Pills > $180.00

Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 The first time I saw autotest (presented by Anthony), diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 the idea of Continuous Testing captured me.

Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 I live in a .NET world most of the time, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 and I know of no similar solution for .NET.  It’s been awhile since that first time, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 and I’ve tinkered here and there trying to get something comparable, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 but usually come up short.  That is until I found watchr.

Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 Watchr gave me the file change detection capabilities I needed, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 and the extensibility to do whatever I want when a file has been detected as changed.  This made it incredibly easy to hook up some autotest goodness in my .NET world.

Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 You'll have to have ruby installed, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 and gems.  Then, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 the very first thing you'll have to do is

Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 gem install watchr --source=http://gemcutter.org

Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 Here is my watchr script:

require 'autotest.rb'

watch( '^.*UnitTest.*.cs$' ) do |match|
  run_test(match.to_s)
end

Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 This is basically just a regex that says to watch any *.cs files that also contain the string “UnitTest”, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 and when it finds a change in a file matching that description, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 call run_test with the matched file name.

Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 So all the magic is in autotest.rb… lets check it out:

require 'rexml/document'

def build(test_project)
  `msbuild /nologo #{test_project}`
end

def mstest(test_container, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 test_results_file, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 tests_to_run)
  tests_to_run = ([""] << tests_to_run).flatten

  File.delete(test_results_file) if File.exists?(test_results_file)
  `mstest /nologo /resultsfile:#{test_results_file} /testcontainer:#{test_container} #{tests_to_run.join(" /test:")}`
  test_results = process_mstest_results(test_results_file)
  File.delete(test_results_file) if File.exists?(test_results_file)

  return test_results
end

def process_mstest_results(results_file)
  results = {}
  File.open(results_file) do |file|
    xml = REXML::Document.new(file)

    results[:num_tests] = xml.get_elements("//UnitTestResult").length
    failures = []
    xml.elements.each("//UnitTestResult[@outcome='Failed']") do |e|
      failure = {}
      failure[:message] = e.elements["Output/ErrorInfo/Message"].get_text

      stack = e.elements["Output/ErrorInfo/StackTrace"].get_text.value
      stack_match = /^.*at (.*) in(.*):line (\d+)$/.match(stack)

      failure[:stack] = stack_match[1] if stack_match
      failure[:location] = stack_match[2] if stack_match
      failure[:line] = stack_match[3] if stack_match

      failure[:stack] = stack if !stack_match

      failures << failure
    end
    results[:failures] = failures
  end

  return results
end

def show_results(results)
  puts "#{results[:num_tests]} tests run (#{results[:failures].length} failures)"
  results[:failures].each do |failure|
      puts "---------------------------------------"
      puts "Message: #{failure[:message]}"
      puts "Location: #{failure[:location]}"
      puts "Line: #{failure[:line]}"
      puts "Stack Trace: #{failure[:stack]}"
  end
end

def run_test(file_name)
  test_container = ""
  test_results_file = "result.trx"
  test_project = ""

  system("cls")
  system("echo Detected change in:")
  system("echo   #{file_name}")
  system("echo Building and Testing")

  test_namespace = ''
  test_class = ''
  test_names = []

  File.open(file_name, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 "r") do |f|
    f.each do |line|
      ns_match = /^namespace (.*)$/.match(line)
      test_namespace = ns_match[1] if ns_match

      class_match = /^\s*public class (.\w*).*$/.match(line)
      test_class = class_match[1] if class_match

      test_name_match = /^\s*public void (\w*).*$/.match(line)
      test_names << test_name_match[1] if test_name_match
    end
  end

  test_names = test_names.map { |n| "#{test_namespace}.#{test_class}.#{n}" }

  build(test_project)
  results = mstest(test_container, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 test_results_file, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 test_names)
  show_results(results)
end

Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 The key parts (I think) are the fact that I’m using MSTest to run my tests (this can easily be modified to run your framework of choice… note MSTest is not my choice ;) ).  The result parsing is also specific to the MSTest output format, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 but should be simple enough for any framework that can output XML. Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 Also, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 I'm making some assumptions based on my project... Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 we've got one unit test project, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 so I know I can run tests in a single DLL, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 and rebuilding only that project, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 I don't have to worry about choosing the correct project and output dll to build and run tests in.

Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 To get the thing up and running, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 just run

Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 watchr <path to watchr script>

Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 Please, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 use/adapt/give feedback/whatever at will.

Diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 Go forth and autotest, diabetes treatment > lantus (generic) > 60 pills > $180.00 .NET comrades!

Average Rating: 4.6 out of 5 based on 172 user reviews.

30Mar/090

ADHD > Atomoxetine 40mg Pills > 180 Pills > $236.00

Adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 I'm in the middle of writing a bunch of XML API documentation for a prototype I just built.  I'm not really a fan of xml doc-comments, adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 which is why I didn't do it in the first place, adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 but the client wants API documentation, adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 so this is definitely the best way to get it.  The two aforementioned tools?

GhostDoc

Adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 GhostDoc basically infers the documentation from the name of the method and its parameter signature.  Absolutely brilliant.  Hook this baby up with a keyboard shortcut, adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 and blam!, adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 it just spits out documentation with a keystroke (which of course is easy to tweak once it's there).  One of the  awesome features is that for implemented methods of an interface, adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 it'll use the exact documentation from the doc-comments from the interface file.  Sweet.

Docu

Adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 Docu is sort of like the NDoc of old.  I know that SandCastle exists, adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 but this is so much simpler.  It uses the Spark view engine/templating system, adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 so that means the output is completely customizable.  Right now it comes with a single template, adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 that is heavily inspired by rdoc rather than something like MSDN style (though I'm certain an MSDN style template will be contributed to the project soon).  The project is really young, adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 but it is used already by FluentNHibernate (and was the reason for its inception, adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 really).  Here is the output for the FluentNH project: FluentNH API Docs.

Adhd > atomoxetine 40mg pills > 180 pills > $236.00 Amazazing.

Average Rating: 5 out of 5 based on 291 user reviews.